The Autorité has fined three professional canning associations and a can manufacturers’ trade union for having implemented practices intended to prevent competition on the presence, or absence, of Bisphenol A (BPA) in food containers, in the context of the adoption of the French law of 24 December 2012 banning the use of BPA in all food containers as of 1 January 2015. The cartel was organised during the transitional phase, during which cans with and without BPA were simultaneously placed on the market (a grace period introduced to allow stocks to be used up).

These practices, which together constitute a single, complex and continuous infringement (SCCI), were implemented from 6 October 2010 to 21 July 2015, i.e. over more than four years, and took two forms:

Preventing manufacturers from communicating on the absence of BPA in their food containers:

Encouraging manufacturers to refuse to supply BPA-free cans before 1 January 2015 and then to refuse to stop selling cans with BPA after this date, despite the demands of the mass retail distribution sector to this effect. The FIAC and the SNFBM are the only two collective organisations implicated in this second practice and, hence, in the SCCI constituted by the two practices together.

11 companies, in their capacity as members of the above-mentioned collective organisations, and whose individual participation in the cartel was deemed to have been proven by the Autorité, have also been fined. For the most part, this individual participation took the form of attending meetings organised by their associations or trade unions, the purpose of which was anticompetitive. These companies are the canning companies Andros, Bonduelle, Charles & Alice, Cofigeo, Conserves France, D’Aucy, General Mills and Unilever, and the can suppliers Ardagh, Crown and Massilly.

The four professional organisations and 11 member companies have been fined a total of €19,553,400.

The Autorité considers the two practices constituting the SCCI to be very serious, as they meant that consumers were unable to choose BPA-free products, at a time when these products were available and when BPA was already considered dangerous to health.

Nevertheless, the Autorité departed from its notice on fines, taking into account the diversity of the entities implicated, in terms of both their economic heft and their role within the sector: on the one hand, the professional organisations sanctioned as directly responsible for the practices in question; on the other, the companies sanctioned as members of these organisations, on account of their individual participation. The Autorité considered that, in this context, applying the notice on fines would have led to disproportionate fines being imposed on the companies.

The Autorité also took into account the specific legal and regulatory framework in which the practices in question took place and the actions of the authorities vis-à-vis the players in the sector as mitigating factors.

Fines of Almost €20 Million Imposed for Bisphenol A Cartel in Food Containers Industry

The French competition authority has fined three professional canning associations and a can manufacturers' trade union, along with 11 member companies, for implementing practices that prevented competition on the presence or absence of Bisphenol A (BPA) in food containers. The practices involved preventing manufacturers from communicating on the absence of BPA in their containers and encouraging manufacturers to refuse to supply BPA-free cans before the ban came into effect. The authority considered the practices to be very serious as they deprived consumers of the choice of BPA-free products. However, the fines imposed took into account the diversity of the entities involved and the specific legal and regulatory framework.